Improve understanding and documentation for sampling point results
I have a few questions regarding the sampling points, which MiSa.C produces and which can be viewed and downloaded in the result panel.
- Why is the number of samples increasing heavily from 1st class run to the last class run, while less pixel are available for sampling. Below are two figures for the sample point distribution of the first and last class. The first class are 2204 points, and the last class 21004 points.
- In the geojson file all points are listed (see example figure below). The points can be differentiated by "nam", which is either 1 or 2. 2 means correctly predicted and 1 not. But there are X number of models. So the question is to which model these points refer to?
I will ask Carsten again and will update some points here, but we still need to include the details to the documentation afterwards.